This is basically the
first-in a three-part series on local sexual variety challenges.
This piece introduces the thought of “game
imbalance”, describes it, and posits it as an adding reason for
men’s room difficulties with ladies.
I’ve an alternate theory exactly why particular courses of males fight
with females more than particular other courses would, on average.
Alternative from what most dudes cite: looks discrimination, racial
discrimination, level discrimination, income discrimination, etc.
One we’ve been seeing more problems from on the
conversation
boards
recently are guys of Indian lineage. Asian and Arab guys
struggle a
great deal too. Of course, males of most races complain about their
inabilities to succeed with ladies (and that I’ve heard an abundance of success
stories and identified
truly
enough profitable men from all of these racial groups), however of
these race-level grievances are far more ubiquitous as opposed to others.
Just what exactly helps to make the distinction?
I’ve a theory. In fact, a hypothesis. Let me refer to it as “game
imbalance hypothesis.”
And if you will go beside me a second, I’ll demonstrate how I think the
effect the theory defines is hampering some guys and favoring
other individuals when you look at the
sexual marketplace
.